5 Things Every Data Engineer Should Know About Data Observability and Monitoring

Discover the essentials of data observability and monitoring for data engineers, including key metrics, tools, automation, and proactive strategies.
Ainslie Eck
Data Governance Specialist

In the era of data-driven decision-making, data engineers play a pivotal role in maintaining the integrity and reliability of data systems. One essential aspect of this responsibility is ensuring data observability and monitoring are integrated into data pipelines. With growing complexity in data ecosystems, understanding the nuances of observability and monitoring can be the difference between smooth operations and costly downtime.

What is data observability for data engineers?

Data observability for data engineers refers to the comprehensive monitoring, tracking, and understanding of data pipelines, systems, and processes to ensure data quality, reliability, and performance. It involves gaining full visibility into the health and behavior of data as it flows through the infrastructure, from source systems to analytics platforms. 

Data observability tools and practices help engineers detect, diagnose, and resolve issues such as data anomalies, schema changes, pipeline failures, and performance bottlenecks in real-time. These tools allow engineers to proactively address problems before they escalate and affect business-critical operations

By providing insights into metrics like data freshness, completeness, accuracy, and lineage, data observability ensures that organizations can trust their data for decision-making and downstream applications. It enables better collaboration between teams, ensures compliance with data governance standards, and supports the scalability of data systems. 

Here are five critical aspects every data engineer should know about data observability and monitoring.

1. The Difference Between Observability and Monitoring

While observability and monitoring are related, they serve distinct purposes:

  • Monitoring involves tracking specific metrics and generating alerts when predefined thresholds are crossed. For example, monitoring can notify you if data freshness exceeds a set limit or if data volume drops below expectations.
  • Observability goes deeper, providing comprehensive insights into the internal state of data systems by examining logs, metrics, and traces. It answers "why" an issue occurred and helps pinpoint the root cause.

Understanding the difference ensures data engineers implement tools and processes that not only detect problems but also provide actionable insights to resolve them.

2. Key Metrics for Effective Observability

Observability relies on tracking critical metrics that reflect the health of data pipelines. Data engineers should prioritize the following:

  • Freshness: Is the data being updated as expected, and how recent is it?
  • Volume: Are the amounts of incoming and processed data consistent with historical trends?
  • Schema: Have there been any changes in data structure, such as added or missing fields, that could break downstream systems?
  • Distribution: Are statistical properties like averages, variances, or null rates within acceptable ranges?
  • Lineage: How does data move through the pipeline, and where might errors propagate?

Establishing and automating the monitoring of these metrics ensures comprehensive oversight of pipeline health.

3. Proactive vs. Reactive Monitoring

Proactive monitoring focuses on preventing issues before they occur, while reactive monitoring identifies and resolves issues after they arise.

  • Proactive Monitoring: Leverages predictive insights and anomaly detection to address potential failures early. For example, tools may flag a slower-than-usual data ingestion process before it impacts reporting.
  • Reactive Monitoring: Provides alerts and diagnostics after an issue has occurred, helping teams resolve it quickly.

Data engineers should aim to build a system where proactive monitoring reduces the reliance on reactive responses, minimizing downtime and its impact.

4. Choosing the Right Tools

Numerous tools and platforms cater to data observability and monitoring. Choosing the right one depends on your organization’s specific needs, such as pipeline complexity, scale, and existing infrastructure.

Popular tools for data observability include:

  • Monte Carlo: Provides automated anomaly detection and monitoring across pipelines.
  • Secoda: Focuses on making data discovery and observability simple, offering tools for tracking data lineage, cataloging, and understanding pipeline performance.
  • Datadog: Offers a unified view of logs, metrics, and traces, combining observability for both software and data systems.

Additionally, many modern data platforms, such as Snowflake, dbt, and Airflow, have built-in monitoring features that integrate seamlessly into existing workflows.

5. The Role of Automation in Observability

Manual monitoring is not scalable in modern, dynamic data environments. Automation is essential for maintaining consistent oversight and rapid response capabilities.

Data engineers can:

  • Automate Alerts: Set up triggers for anomalies in freshness, volume, or schema changes to ensure timely notification of issues.
  • Use AI/ML for Anomaly Detection: Implement machine learning models that learn baseline behavior and flag deviations, even for unknown issues.
  • Build Dashboards: Visualize key metrics for at-a-glance health checks of data systems.
  • Automate Remediation: Develop scripts or workflows to resolve common issues automatically, such as reprocessing failed data batches.

Automation reduces human error, speeds up response times, and ensures 24/7 oversight of critical systems.

Keep reading

View all